← Selected work
GENERAL MOTORS / 2014–2023

A shared UI foundation.
Across enterprise products.

Modernizing supplier systems through Angular architecture, reusable interface patterns, and close collaboration with product, UX, QA, and engineering.

9 yearsEnterprise UI work
3 systemsSQMS · SCMS · SPPS
40+Developers mentored
UI architectDesign through delivery
01 / THE ENGAGEMENT

Consistency was a platform problem.

Supplier systems carried quality, sourcing, and performance workflows across a global organization. The modernization effort moved legacy JSP interfaces toward Angular frontends and service-based integration. A useful design standard had to survive different product requirements, teams, and releases.

Jeff’s role joined interface architecture with delivery: reusable Angular components, state-management patterns, API conventions, UI specifications, stakeholder workshops, workflow refinement, and release readiness.

The design challenge

Make related applications feel coherent while allowing each to express its own business rules. A shared visual language had to be supported by shared behavior, clear requirements, and maintainable implementation.

The organizational challenge

Align product owners, subject-matter experts, suppliers, UX, QA, support, and engineering around decisions that could be implemented and reviewed consistently.

Documented contributionShared component libraries · Angular and NgRx patterns · WCAG 2.1 AA compliance · Workflow and UI specifications · Technical workshops · UAT coordination · L3 support
02 / DESIGN RECONSTRUCTION

Show the reasoning through a concrete workflow.

The screens, records, code, and workflow below were created for this portfolio in 2026. They illustrate the approach using fictional supplier-quality cases; they are not original GM screens, code, or research artifacts.

The representative task is straightforward: find a case, understand its context, assign the next action, and know whether the update was saved. That task exposes the difficult interface decisions that feature lists tend to hide.

Supplier Experience System
v2.4 · READY FOR DEV
01

Semantic color

12 variables
Ink / strong#0B1F3A
Action / primary#1769E0
Action / subtle#DCE8FF
Status / success#087A55
Status / critical#B33A2B
Surface / canvas#F4F7FB
02

Product typography

7 styles
Supplier case review
Corrective action details
Review the affected part, supplier response, and required containment action.
STATUS / OWNER / LAST UPDATED
03

Spacing and density

8px base
4812162432
ComfortableStandardCompact

Interactive board: click Foundations / Components / States above to switch panels. Not a Figma file — a static reconstruction of one.

Editable wireframe board showing the queue-to-review-to-action flow, layout exploration, rationale, and acceptance criteria
Design choices in the reconstruction
DecisionUser benefitTradeoff
Keep the queue beside the editor.Retain orientation while reviewing a case.The detail region stacks below the queue on narrower screens.
Keep one record in edit scope.Make ownership of unsaved changes clear.Filters and other Open actions pause until the editor closes.
Use labels with status colors.Status remains understandable without color perception.Requires room for explicit text in dense tables.
Use a deliberate save action.The person knows when a change is submitted.Needs dirty, saving, failure, and success states.
Preserve edits after a failed save.A service failure does not make the person repeat their work.Form draft state must be separate from saved records.
Detailed design board with queue and editor, save-failure and empty states, colors, typography, and spacing tokens

SVG files contain editable shapes, text, and named groups for Figma import. They are not native Figma files or historical project deliverables.

03 / CLICKABLE WORKFLOW

Find the case.
Make the next decision.

A deliberately bounded prototype, separate from the full Angular reference implementation in the next section. Choose a case, update its owner or action, and test successful and failed saves without losing the draft.

Supplier QualityCase Management
JM

Supplier cases

24 active records
SQ-10482

Northstar Components

In review
PARTSteering column bracket
PLANTArlington Assembly
SEVERITYMedium
UPDATED12 minutes ago

Vanilla JS, not the Angular build below — a lightweight inline taste of the interaction before the full NgRx implementation.

04 / ANGULAR IMPLEMENTATION

Make the design contract executable.

The reference implementation uses Angular 16, NgRx Store and Effects, RxJS, typed reactive forms, and OnPush components. The version aligns with the later period of the enterprise work. This newly authored example is a demonstration, not a production dependency recommendation.

Component layerQueue presentation · Editor form · Accessible feedback
State and effectsQuery and selection · Saved records · Request lifecycle
Service boundaryAsynchronous search · Explicit writes · Revision checks

Server state and form state have different jobs.

The store holds saved records and request status. The typed reactive form owns the draft. A save error changes the feedback, not the input values. A successful save returns a revised record and resets the form to that new baseline.

Reads and writes need different concurrency rules.

Search uses switchMap so a newer query replaces an older request. Save uses exhaustMap so repeated clicks cannot submit multiple writes while one is pending. Errors are caught inside each request stream so later actions still work.

A real API integration would replace the mock service behind this boundary. Request types describe the contract; runtime response validation, authorization, idempotency, and revision enforcement still belong at the appropriate client and server boundaries.

Request coordinationeffects.ts

Search cancellation, explicit save concurrency, and recoverable request streams.

import { Injectable, inject } from '@angular/core';
import { Actions, createEffect, ofType } from '@ngrx/effects';
import { catchError, exhaustMap, map, of, switchMap, timer } from 'rxjs';
import { DemoCasesApi } from './demo-api';
import * as Cases from './state';

@Injectable()
export class CasesEffects {
  private readonly actions$ = inject(Actions);
  private readonly api = inject(DemoCasesApi);

  // A new query immediately cancels the old debounce and the old request.
  load$ = createEffect(() => this.actions$.pipe(
    ofType(Cases.queryChanged),
    switchMap(({ query }) => timer(180).pipe(
      switchMap(() => this.api.search(query)),
      map(items => Cases.loadSucceeded({ items })),
      catchError((error: Error) => of(Cases.loadFailed({ message: error.message })))
    ))
  ));

  // Ignore repeated clicks until this submission settles. Do not auto-retry writes.
  save$ = createEffect(() => this.actions$.pipe(
    ofType(Cases.saveRequested),
    exhaustMap(({ update }) => this.api.update(update).pipe(
      map(item => Cases.saveSucceeded({ item })),
      catchError((error: Error) => of(Cases.saveFailed({ message: error.message })))
    ))
  ));
}
Typed editor and validationeditor.component.ts

A draft stays editable after failure. Required fields reject whitespace-only values.

import { ChangeDetectionStrategy, Component, EventEmitter, Input, OnChanges, Output, SimpleChanges } from '@angular/core';
import { CommonModule } from '@angular/common';
import { AbstractControl, FormControl, FormGroup, ReactiveFormsModule, ValidationErrors } from '@angular/forms';
import { CaseStatus, CaseUpdate, SupplierCase } from './models';

const meaningfulText = (minimum: number) => (control: AbstractControl): ValidationErrors | null =>
  String(control.value ?? '').trim().length >= minimum ? null : { meaningfulText: true };

@Component({
  selector: 'case-editor', standalone: true, imports: [CommonModule, ReactiveFormsModule],
  changeDetection: ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush,
  template: `
    <section class="editor" aria-labelledby="editor-heading">
      <div class="editor-heading"><div><p class="micro">CASE DETAILS</p><h2 id="editor-heading" tabindex="-1">{{ item.id }}</h2></div><button type="button" class="secondary" (click)="close.emit()" [disabled]="saving">{{ form.dirty ? 'Discard & close' : 'Close' }}</button></div>
      <p class="supplier-name">{{ item.supplier }}</p><p>{{ item.summary }}</p>
      <div class="revision">Revision {{ item.revision }} · {{ item.priority }} priority</div>
      <form [formGroup]="form" (ngSubmit)="submit()" novalidate>
        <fieldset [disabled]="saving">
          <label for="case-owner">Action owner</label><input id="case-owner" formControlName="owner" [attr.aria-invalid]="form.controls.owner.invalid && form.controls.owner.touched" aria-describedby="owner-help">
          <p id="owner-help" class="field-help" [class.validation]="form.controls.owner.invalid && form.controls.owner.touched">Enter at least 3 non-whitespace characters.</p>
          <label for="case-status">Status</label><select id="case-status" formControlName="status"><option>Open</option><option>In review</option><option>Resolved</option></select>
          <label for="case-note">Action note</label><textarea id="case-note" rows="4" formControlName="note" [attr.aria-invalid]="form.controls.note.invalid && form.controls.note.touched" aria-describedby="note-help"></textarea>
          <p id="note-help" class="field-help" [class.validation]="form.controls.note.invalid && form.controls.note.touched">Describe the next action or decision; at least 12 characters.</p>
          <p class="dirty" aria-live="polite">{{ form.dirty ? 'Unsaved changes' : 'No unsaved changes' }}</p>
          <div class="editor-actions"><button type="submit" [disabled]="saving || !form.dirty">{{ saving ? 'Saving…' : 'Save changes' }}</button><button type="button" class="secondary" (click)="reset()" [disabled]="saving || !form.dirty">Discard edits</button></div>
        </fieldset>
        <p class="feedback error" *ngIf="error" role="alert">{{ error }}</p>
        <p class="feedback success" *ngIf="notice" role="status">{{ notice }}</p>
      </form>
    </section>`
})
export class CaseEditorComponent implements OnChanges {
  @Input({ required: true }) item!: SupplierCase;
  @Input() saving = false;
  @Input() error: string | null = null;
  @Input() notice: string | null = null;
  @Output() save = new EventEmitter<CaseUpdate>();
  @Output() close = new EventEmitter<void>();
  readonly form = new FormGroup({
    owner: new FormControl('', { nonNullable: true, validators: [meaningfulText(3)] }),
    status: new FormControl<CaseStatus>('Open', { nonNullable: true }),
    note: new FormControl('', { nonNullable: true, validators: [meaningfulText(12)] })
  });
  ngOnChanges(changes: SimpleChanges): void {
    // Failures change only `error`; the user's unsaved form stays untouched.
    if (changes['item']) this.reset();
  }
  reset(): void { this.form.reset({ owner: this.item.owner, status: this.item.status, note: this.item.note }); }
  submit(): void {
    if (this.saving) return;
    this.form.markAllAsTouched();
    if (this.form.invalid) return;
    this.save.emit({ ...this.form.getRawValue(), id: this.item.id, revision: this.item.revision });
  }
}
Actions, reducer, and view modelstate.ts

Saved data and request state are explicit. A selector supplies the presentation model.

import { createAction, createReducer, on, props, createFeatureSelector, createSelector } from '@ngrx/store';
import { CasesState, CaseUpdate, Query, SupplierCase } from './models';

export const queryChanged = createAction('[Cases] Query changed', props<{ query: Query }>());
export const loadSucceeded = createAction('[Cases API] Load succeeded', props<{ items: readonly SupplierCase[] }>());
export const loadFailed = createAction('[Cases API] Load failed', props<{ message: string }>());
export const caseSelected = createAction('[Cases] Selected', props<{ id: string | null }>());
export const saveRequested = createAction('[Case editor] Save requested', props<{ update: CaseUpdate }>());
export const saveSucceeded = createAction('[Cases API] Save succeeded', props<{ item: SupplierCase }>());
export const saveFailed = createAction('[Cases API] Save failed', props<{ message: string }>());

export const initialState: CasesState = {
  items: [], query: { term: '', status: 'All' }, selectedId: null,
  loading: false, loadError: null, saving: false, saveError: null, notice: null
};
export const casesReducer = createReducer(initialState,
  on(queryChanged, (state, { query }) => ({ ...state, query, loading: true, loadError: null, selectedId: null, saveError: null, notice: null })),
  on(loadSucceeded, (state, { items }) => ({ ...state, items, loading: false })),
  on(loadFailed, (state, { message }) => ({ ...state, items: [], loading: false, loadError: message })),
  on(caseSelected, (state, { id }) => ({ ...state, selectedId: id, saveError: null, notice: null })),
  on(saveRequested, state => ({ ...state, saving: true, saveError: null, notice: null })),
  on(saveSucceeded, (state, { item }) => ({ ...state, saving: false, items: state.items.map(row => row.id === item.id ? item : row), notice: `Saved ${item.id}. Revision ${item.revision}.` })),
  on(saveFailed, (state, { message }) => ({ ...state, saving: false, saveError: message }))
);
const selectCases = createFeatureSelector<CasesState>('cases');
export const selectViewModel = createSelector(selectCases, state => ({
  ...state,
  visibleItems: state.items.filter(row => state.query.status === 'All' || row.status === state.query.status),
  selected: state.items.find(row => row.id === state.selectedId) ?? null
}));
Service boundary and revision checksdemo-api.ts

The local service simulates latency, one-time failures, validation, and stale-write rejection.

import { Injectable } from '@angular/core';
import { Observable, timer, map } from 'rxjs';
import { FIXTURES } from './data';
import { CaseUpdate, Query, SupplierCase } from './models';

@Injectable({ providedIn: 'root' })
export class DemoCasesApi {
  private rows = FIXTURES.map(row => ({ ...row }));
  failNextLoad = false;
  failNextSave = false;

  search(query: Query): Observable<readonly SupplierCase[]> {
    return timer(450).pipe(map(() => {
      if (this.failNextLoad) { this.failNextLoad = false; throw new Error('The queue could not be loaded. Retry with your filters intact.'); }
      const term = query.term.trim().toLowerCase();
      return this.rows.filter(row => (!term || `${row.id} ${row.supplier} ${row.summary}`.toLowerCase().includes(term)) && (query.status === 'All' || row.status === query.status)).map(row => ({ ...row }));
    }));
  }

  update(update: CaseUpdate): Observable<SupplierCase> {
    return timer(600).pipe(map(() => {
      if (this.failNextSave) { this.failNextSave = false; throw new Error('The update could not be saved. Your edits are still here; retry when ready.'); }
      const index = this.rows.findIndex(row => row.id === update.id);
      if (index < 0) throw new Error('The selected case no longer exists.');
      if (this.rows[index].revision !== update.revision) throw new Error('This record changed. Reopen it before submitting a new update.');
      if (update.owner.trim().length < 3 || update.note.trim().length < 12) throw new Error('Enter an owner and a clear action note.');
      const item = { ...this.rows[index], ...update, owner: update.owner.trim(), note: update.note.trim(), revision: update.revision + 1 };
      this.rows = this.rows.map((row, position) => position === index ? item : row);
      return { ...item };
    }));
  }
}
05 / VALIDATION AND OUTCOMES

Test the behavior that can break the experience.

In the enterprise engagement

Requirements refinement, acceptance criteria, UAT coordination, defect triage, architecture reviews, and rotating production support connected design decisions to working systems. Shared components and standards were adopted across product teams, with mentoring for more than 40 developers.

Jeff’s career materials report an approximately 30% improvement in delivery velocity. That is an engagement outcome; no such result is claimed for this reconstruction.

In this portfolio example

Strict Angular template compilation checks the component contracts. Six automated checks exercise the reconstructed workflow’s failure and concurrency behavior.

  • A newer search cancels the previous result.
  • A failed save preserves the form draft.
  • Whitespace-only notes fail validation.
  • Repeated submits create one pending write.
  • A stale revision is rejected.
  • Filters remain available after a failed load.

What would be measured with real users?

For this reconstructed workflow, the proposed measures are time to find the right case, successful update rate, validation corrections, recovery after service failure, and keyboard task completion. These are a proposed evaluation plan, not invented research results.

06 / REVIEW THE WORK